Showing posts with label linear inequality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label linear inequality. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 18, 2023

B.2 - Mathematical Modelling Involving Inequalities

In the previous section, we saw the mathematical model for the motion of a simple pendulum. In this section, we will see another example.

Example 3:
• The situation is:
A farm house uses atleast 800 kg of special food daily. The special food is a mixture of corn and soyabean with the following compositions:
$\begin{array}{cc}{}    &{\textbf{Material}}    &{\textbf{Protein present per Kg}}    &{\textbf{Fibre present per Kg}}    &{\textbf{Cost per Kg}}\\
{}    &{\textbf{Corn}}    &{0.09}    &{0.02}    &{\text{Rs 10}}\\
{}    &{\textbf{Soyabean}}    &{0.60}    &{0.06}    &{\text{Rs 20}}\\
\end{array}$
The dietary requirements of the special food stipulate atleast 30% protein and at most 5% fibre. How can this dietary requirement be satisfied at the least possible cost?
• This situation can be converted into a mathematical problem. For that, we engage in the process of mathematical modeling. The final result can be obtained in 4 steps:
 

Step 1:
First we study the situation. We will write it in order:

(i) “Atleast 800 kg” means:
    ♦ The total quantity should not be less than 800 kg.
    ♦ The total quantity can be greater than 800 kg.
(ii) The available nutrients and costs can be listed:
• One kg corn will
    ♦ give 0.09 kg protein.
    ♦ give 0.02 kg fibre.
    ♦ cost Rs 10
• One kg soya bean will give
    ♦ give 0.60 kg protein.
    ♦ give 0.06 kg fibre.
    ♦ cost Rs 20
(iii) Our aim is:
• The 800 kg (or more) food must
    ♦ contain atleast 30% protein.
    ♦ contain at most 5% fibre.
    ♦ cost the least possible amount.

• We can write:
Step 1 involves studying the situation and identifying the parameters. Essential parameters should be carefully identified.

Step 2:
This can be written in order:
(i) Let the food be made up of x kg corn and y kg of soya bean.
• Then from (i) of step 1, we can write: x + y ≥ 800

(ii) Available protein and fibre:
• From the x kg corn, we will get some protein and fibre.
• From the y kg soya bean also, we will get some protein and fibre.
• Then from (ii) of step 1, we can write:
    ♦ Total protein than can be obtained from x kg corn and y kg soya bean is:
0.09x + 0.60y   
    ♦ Total fibre than can be obtained from x kg corn and y kg soya bean is:
0.02x + 0.06y

(iii) Checking whether the dietary requirements are fulfilled:
• We are taking (x+y) kg food. This will contain (0.09x + 0.60y) kg of protein.
Then from (iii) of step 1, we can write:
$\begin{array}{ll}{}    &{\frac{0.09x + 0.60y}{x+y} \times 100}    & {~\ge~}    &{30}    &{} \\
{\Rightarrow}    &{\frac{0.09x + 0.60y}{x+y}}    & {~\ge~}    &{0.30}    &{} \\
{\Rightarrow}    &{0.09x + 0.60y}    & {~\ge~}    &{0.30 x + 0.30y}    &{} \\
{\Rightarrow}    &{0.30y}    & {~\ge~}    &{0.21 x}    &{} \\
{\Rightarrow}    &{0}    & {~\ge~}    &{0.21 x – 0.30 y}    &{} \\
{\Rightarrow}    &{0.21 x – 0.30 y}    & {~\le~}    &{0}    &{} \\
\end{array}$

• We are taking (x+y) kg food. This will contain (0.02x + 0.06y) kg of fibre.
Then from (iii) of step 1, we can write:
$\begin{array}{ll}{}    &{\frac{0.02x + 0.06y}{x+y} \times 100}    & {~\le~}    &{5}    &{} \\
{\Rightarrow}    &{\frac{0.02x + 0.06y}{x+y}}    & {~\le~}    &{0.05}    &{} \\
{\Rightarrow}    &{0.02x + 0.06y}    & {~\le~}    &{0.05 x + 0.05y}    &{} \\
{\Rightarrow}    &{0.01y}    & {~\le~}    &{0.03 x}    &{} \\
{\Rightarrow}    &{0}    & {~\le~}    &{0.03 x – 0.01 y}    &{} \\
{\Rightarrow}    &{0.03 x – 0.01 y}    & {~\ge~}    &{0}    &{} \\
\end{array}$

(iv) Checking cost:
We are taking (x+y) kg food. That food will cost (10x + 20y)
Then from (iii) of step 1, we can write: (10x + 20y) should be as small as possible.

• We can write:
Step 2 involves drawing the necessary diagrams and writing the relevant mathematical equations/inequalities. In short, we write a mathematical problem in this step. Any mathematical problem will have a definite solution. So in this step, it is necessary to recheck all the works done thus far.

Step 3:
In this step, we put the equations and inequalities into actual use. This can be written in order:

(i) From (i) of step 2, we have:
x + y ≥ 800
• The red line in fig.B.2 below represents
x + y = 800

Fig.B.2

• So any (x,y) in the upper half plane II of the red line will satisfy the inequality. See section 6.3.

(ii) From (iii) of step 2, we have:
0.21x - 0.30y ≤ 0
• The magenta line in fig.B.2 above represents
0.21x - 0.30y = 0
• So any (x,y) in the upper half plane II of the magenta line will satisfy the inequality.

(iii) Again from (iii) of step 2, we have:
0.03x - 0.01y ≥ 0
• The green line in fig.B.2 above represents
0.03x - 0.01y = 0
• So any (x,y) in the lower half plane I of the green line will satisfy the inequality.

(iv) So we have three regions:
    ♦ upper half plane II of the red line.
    ♦ upper half plane II of the magenta line.
    ♦ lower half plane I of the green line.
• The three regions will over lap in the yellow region shown in fig.B.2.
• So any (x,y) in the yellow region will satisfy all the three inequalities.

(v) From (iv) of step 2, we have:
(10x + 20y) must be as small as possible.
• For that, x and y must be as small as possible. At the same time, x and y must satisfy all three inequalities.
• This point is marked by a cyan dot in fig.B.2 above.
• If we draw a vertical line through the cyan dot, then that line will meet the x-axis at 470.59
• If we draw a horizontal line through the cyan dot, then that line will meet the y-axis at 329.41
• So the required point is (470.6,329.4)
• We can write:
Step 3 involves the actual application of the result obtained in step 2. Calculators or digital computers can be used for lengthy problems.

Step 4:
This can be written in order:
(i) First we do the validation.
• We are going to buy 470.6 kg corn and 329.4 kg soya bean.
• So total quantity = (470.6 + 329.4) = 800.
Thus “atleast 800” is satisfied.
• In this way all the dietary requirements can be checked. This will complete the validation process.
(ii) Next we do the interpretation.
• We state that:
If we buy 470.6 kg corn and 329.4 kg soya bean, then all the dietary requirements will be satisfied and at the same time, the cost will be the least possible value. The least possible cost is (470.6 × 10 + 329.4 × 20) = Rs 11294.00
• We can write:
In step 4, we do validation and interpretation.


In the next section, we will see one more example.

Previous

Contents

Next

Copyright©2023 Higher secondary mathematics.blogspot.com

Sunday, July 3, 2022

Chapter 6.6 - Miscellaneous Examples

In the previous section, we completed a discussion on solving a system of linear inequalities in two variables. In this section we will see some miscellaneous examples.

Solved example 6.17
Solve –8 ≤ 5x – 3 < 7
Solution:
1. This is a double inequality. We can rearrange it as two inequalities:
(i) –8 ≤ 5x – 3
(ii) 5x – 3 < 7
2. The first inequality is: –8 ≤ 5x – 3
• This can be simplified as follows:
$\begin{array}{ll}
{}&-8 &{}\le{}& {5x-3} &{} \\
\Rightarrow &-8-5x&{}\le{}& 5x-3-5x &\color {green}{\text{(Rule 1)}} \\
\Rightarrow &-8-5x&{}\le{}& -3 &{} \\
\Rightarrow &-8-5x+8&{}\le{}& -3+8 &\color {green}{\text{(Rule 1)}} \\
\Rightarrow &-5x&{}\le{}& 5 &{} \\
\Rightarrow &\frac{-5x}{-5}&{}\ge{}& \frac{5}{-5} &\color {green}{\text{(Rule 3)}} \\
\Rightarrow &x&{}\ge{}& -1 &{} \\
\end{array}$
3. The second inequality is: 5x – 3 < 7
• This can be simplified as follows:
$\begin{array}{ll}
{}&5x-3 &{}<{}& {7} &{} \\
\Rightarrow &5x-3+3&{}<{}& 7+3 &\color {green}{\text{(Rule 1)}} \\
\Rightarrow &5x&{}<{}& 10 &{} \\
\Rightarrow &\frac{5x}{5}&{}<{}& \frac{10}{5} &\color {green}{\text{(Rule 2)}} \\
\Rightarrow &x&{}<{}& 2 &{} \\
\end{array}$
4. Now we can assemble the results:
    ♦ From (2), we see that, x must be greater than or equal to -1
    ♦ From (3), we see that, x must be less than 2
• These two results can be combined as: -1 ≤ x < 2
• In interval form, this can be written as: [-1,2)
• The graphical representation is shown in fig.6.26 below:

Fig.6.26

Solved example 6.18
Solve $-5 \le \frac{5-3x}{2}\le 8$
Solution:
1. This is a double inequality. We can rearrange it as two inequalities:
(i) $-5 \le \frac{5-3x}{2}$
(ii) $\frac{5-3x}{2}\le 8$
2. The first inequality is: $-5 \le \frac{5-3x}{2}$
• This can be simplified as follows:
$\begin{array}{ll}
{}&-5 &{}\le{}& {\frac{5-3x}{2}} &{} \\
\Rightarrow &-5 × 2&{}\le{}& {\frac{5-3x}{2}} × 2 &\color {green}{\text{(Rule 2)}} \\
\Rightarrow &-10&{}\le{}& 5-3x &{} \\
\Rightarrow &-10+3x&{}\le{}& 5-3x+3x &\color {green}{\text{(Rule 1)}} \\
\Rightarrow &-10+3x&{}\le{}& 5 &{} \\
\Rightarrow &-10+3x+10&{}\le{}& 5+10 &\color {green}{\text{(Rule 1)}} \\
\Rightarrow &3x&{}\le{}& 15 &{} \\
\Rightarrow &\frac{3x}{3}&{}\le{}& \frac{15}{3} &\color {green}{\text{(Rule 2)}} \\
\Rightarrow &x&{}\le{}& 5 &{} \\
\end{array}$
3. The second inequality is: $\frac{5-3x}{2}\le 8$
• This can be simplified as follows:
$\begin{array}{ll}
{}&\frac{5-3x}{2} &{}\le{}& {8} &{} \\
\Rightarrow &\frac{5-3x}{2} × 2&{}\le{}& 8 × 2 &\color {green}{\text{(Rule 2)}} \\
\Rightarrow &5-3x&{}\le{}& 16 &{} \\
\Rightarrow &5-3x-5&{}\le{}& 16-5 &{\color {green}{\text{(Rule 1)}}} \\
\Rightarrow &-3x&{}\le{}& 11 &{} \\
\Rightarrow &\frac{-3x}{-3}&{}\ge{}& \frac{11}{-3} &\color {green}{\text{(Rule 3)}} \\
\Rightarrow &x&{}\ge{}& -\frac{11}{3} &{} \\
\end{array}$
4. Now we can assemble the results:
    ♦ From (2), we see that, x must be less than or equal to 5
    ♦ From (3), we see that, x must be greater than or equal to $-\frac{11}{3}$
• These two results can be combined as: $-\frac{11}{3} \le x \le 5$
• In interval form, this can be written as: $\left[-\frac{11}{3}, 5 \right]$
• The graphical representation is shown in fig.6.27 below:

Fig.6.27

Solved example 6.19
Solve the system of inequalities:
3x – 7 < 5 + x
11 – 5x ≤ 1
and represent the solutions on the number line.
Solution:
1. The first inequality is: 3x – 7 < 5 + x
• This can be simplified as follows:
$\begin{array}{ll}
{}&3x-7 &{}<{}& 5+x &{} \\
\Rightarrow &3x-7+(7-x)&{}<{}& 5+x+(7-x) &\color {green}{\text{(Rule 1)}} \\
\Rightarrow &2x&{}<{}& 12 &{} \\
\Rightarrow &\frac{2x}{2}&{}<{}& \frac{12}{2} &\color {green}{\text{(Rule 2)}} \\
\Rightarrow &x&{}<{}& 6 &{} \\
\end{array}$
2. The second inequality is: 11 – 5x ≤ 1
• This can be simplified as follows:
$\begin{array}{ll}
{}&11-5x &{}\le{}& {1} &{} \\
\Rightarrow &11-5x-11&{}\le{}& 1-11 &\color {green}{\text{(Rule 1)}} \\
\Rightarrow &-5x&{}\le{}& -10 &{} \\
\Rightarrow &\frac{-5x}{-5}&{}\ge{}& \frac{-10}{-5} &\color {green}{\text{(Rule 3)}} \\
\Rightarrow &x&{}\ge{}& 2 &{} \\
\end{array}$
3. Now we can assemble the results:
    ♦ From (1), we see that, x must be less than 6
    ♦ From (2), we see that, x must be greater than or equal to 2
• These two results can be combined as: 2 ≤ x < 6
• In interval form, this can be written as: [2,6)
• The graphical representation is shown in fig.6.28 below:

Fig.6.28


Solved example 6.20
In an experiment, a solution of hydrochloric acid is to be kept between 30° and 35° Celsius. What is the range of temperature in degree Fahrenheit if conversion formula is given by $C=\frac{5}{9}(F-32)$, where C and F represent temperature in degree Celsius and degree Fahrenheit, respectively.
Solution:
1. Let the temperature in degree Celsius be TC
Then we can write: 30 < TC <35
2. The conversion formula is: $C=\frac{5}{9}(F-32)$
• This can be rearranged as:
$\begin{array}{ll}
{}&C &{}={}& \frac{5}{9}(F-32) &{} \\
\Rightarrow &\frac{9C}{5}&{}={}& F-32 &{} \\
\Rightarrow &F&{}={}& \frac{9C}{5}+32 &{} \\
\end{array}$
3. Now we can convert from C to F:
• When the Celsius thermometer shows a temperature of 30° Celsius, the Fahrenheit thermometer will show a temperature of $\frac{9 × 30}{5}+32=86$
• When the Celsius thermometer shows a temperature of 35° Celsius, the Fahrenheit thermometer will show a temperature of $\frac{9 × 35}{5}+32=95$
4. So based on step (1), we can write:
If the temperature in degree Fahrenheit is TF, then the required range will be:
86 < TF < 95

Solved example 6.21
A manufacturer has 600 litres of a 12% solution of acid. How many litres of a 30% acid solution must be added to it so that acid content in the resulting mixture will be more than 15% but less than 18%?
Solution:
1. "a 12% solution of acid" means:
If we take 100 litres of that solution, 12 litres will be acid and the remaining 88 litres will be water.
• It is a method for specifying the acid content of a solution.
2. So out of the 600 litres, (6 × 12) = 72 litres will be acid.
3. Now consider the 30% solution.
    ♦ If we take 100 litres of that solution, there will be 30 litres of acid in it.
    ♦ So if we take 1 litre of that solution, there will be 0.3 litres of acid in it.
    ♦ So if we take V litres of that solution, there will be 0.3V litres of acid in it.
4. Let us add V litres of the 30% solution to the original 600 litres of 12 % solution.
• Then the total volume = (600+V) litres
   ♦ This total volume has an original 72 litres of acid.
   ♦ Additionally, now it has 0.3V litres of acid from the newly added V litres
• So the total volume of acid in the newly prepared solution will be (72+0.3V)
5. Now we can write the quantities:
(600+V) litres of the newly prepared solution has (72+0.3V) litres of acid
6. So the acid content of the newly prepared solution = $\left(\frac{72+0.3V}{600+V}\right) × 100$
7. The acid content of the newly prepared solution must be more than 15% but less than 18%.
• So we can write: $15 < \left[\left(\frac{72+0.3V}{600+V}\right) × 100 \right] < 18$
8. This is a double inequality. We can rearrange it as two inequalities:
(i) $15 < \left[\left(\frac{72+0.3V}{600+V}\right) × 100 \right]$
(ii) $\left[\left(\frac{72+0.3V}{600+V}\right) × 100 \right] < 18$
9. The first inequality is: $15 < \left[\left(\frac{72+0.3V}{600+V}\right) × 100 \right]$
• This can be simplified as follows:
$\begin{array}{ll}
{}&15 &{}<{}& \left[\left(\frac{72+0.3V}{600+V}\right) × 100 \right] &{} \\
\Rightarrow &15 × (600+V)&{}<{}& \left[\left(\frac{72+0.3V}{600+V}\right) × 100 \right] × (600+V) &\color {green}{\text{(Rule 2)}} \\
\Rightarrow &15 × (600+V)&{}<{}& (72+0.3V) × 100 &{} \\
\Rightarrow &15 × (600+V) × \frac{1}{100}&{}<{}& (72+0.3V) × 100 ×   \frac{1}{100} &{\color {green}{\text{(Rule 2)}}} \\
\Rightarrow &0.15 × (600+V)&{}<{}& 72+0.3V &{} \\
\Rightarrow &90+0.15V&{}<{}& 72+0.3V &{} \\
\Rightarrow &90+0.15V-90 - 0.3V&{}<{}& 72+0.3V - 90 -0.3V &{\color {green}{\text{(Rule 1)}}} \\
\Rightarrow &-0.15V&{}<{}& -18 &{} \\
\Rightarrow &-0.15V × -1 × \frac{1}{0.15}&{}>{}& -18 × -1 × \frac{1}{0.15} &{\color {green}{\text{(Rule 3)}}} \\
\Rightarrow &V&{}>{}& 18 × \frac{1}{0.15} &{} \\
\Rightarrow &V&{}>{}& 120 &{} \\
\end{array}$
10. The second inequality is: $\left[\left(\frac{72+0.3V}{600+V}\right) × 100 \right] < 18$
• This can be simplified as follows:
$\begin{array}{ll}
{}&\left[\left(\frac{72+0.3V}{600+V}\right) × 100 \right] &{}<{}& {18} &{} \\
\Rightarrow &\left[\left(\frac{72+0.3V}{600+V}\right) × 100 \right] × \frac{600+V}{100}&{}<{}& 18 × \frac{600+V}{100} &\color {green}{\text{(Rule 2)}} \\
\Rightarrow &72+0.3V&{}<{}& 0.18 × (600+V) &{} \\
\Rightarrow &72+0.3V&{}<{}& 108+0.18V &{} \\
\Rightarrow &72+0.3V-72-0.18V&{}<{}& 108+0.18V-72-0.18V &{\color {green}{\text{(Rule 1)}}} \\
\Rightarrow &0.12V&{}<{}& 36 &{} \\
\Rightarrow &0.12V × \frac{1}{0.12}&{}<{}& 36 × \frac{1}{0.12} &{\color {green}{\text{(Rule 2)}}} \\
\Rightarrow &V&{}<{}& 300 &{} \\
\end{array}$
11. Now we can assemble the results:
    ♦ From (9), we see that, V must be greater than 120 litres.
    ♦ From (10), we see that, V must be less than 300 litres.
• These two results can be combined as: 120 < V < 300
12. If the additional volume V taken from the 30% solution is greater than 120 litres but less than 300 litres, then the acid strength of the resulting solution will be greater than 15% but less than 18%


The link below gives some more miscellaneous examples:

Miscellaneous Exercise



• In the next chapter, we will see permutations and combinations.

Previous

Contents

Next

Copyright©2022 Higher secondary mathematics.blogspot.com

Tuesday, June 28, 2022

Chapter 6.5 - System of Linear Inequalities

In the previous section, we completed a discussion on linear inequalities in two variables. In this section, we will see the method for solving a system of linear inequalities in two variables. Here also, we will be using the graphical method. We will learn the method through some examples.

Solved example 6.13
Solve the following system of linear equations graphically.
x+y ≥ 5
x-y ≤ 3
Solution:
1. Based on the discussions in the previous two sections, we know how to draw the area which will satisfy x+y ≥ 5
• It is the area hatched with green lines in fig.6.15 below:

Fig.6.15

2. Next step is to plot the graph of x-y = 3 on the same fig. It is shown in fig.6.16 below:

Fig.6.16

3. The final step is to hatch the area which will satisfy x-y ≤ 3 on the same fig.
•This hatching is done using magenta lines as shown in fig.6.17 below:

Gaphical solution of a system of linear inequalities in two variables.
Fig.6.17

• In fig.6.17 above, there are two types of areas:
(i) The area hatched with green lines. 
(ii) The area hatched with magenta lines.
◼ The double hatched region which is common to the above two hatched regions is the solution area of the given system of inequalities.
    ♦ Mark any point in the solution area.
    ♦ Note down the x and y coordinates of that point.
    ♦ Those x and y coordinate values will satisfy both the inequalities in the given system.
4. Some important points can be noted:
(i) We know that the green hatched area is an infinite area. The magenta hatched area is also an infinite area. Consequently, the double hatched area will be an infinite area.
(ii) The point of intersection of the red and white lines will give the solution of the system of equations:
x+y = 5
x-y = 3
(iii) The area of intersection of the green and magenta hatches, will give the solution area of the system of inequalities:
x+y ≥ 5
x-y ≤ 3

Solved example 6.14
Solve the following system of linear equations graphically.
5x+4y ≤ 40
x ≥ 2
y ≥ 3
Solution:
1. Based on the discussions in the previous two sections, we know how to draw the area which will satisfy 5x+4y ≤ 40
• It is the area hatched with green lines in fig.6.18 below:

Fig.6.18

2. Next step is to plot the graphs of x = 2 and y = 3 on the same fig. They are shown as cyan and white lines in fig.6.19 below:

Fig.6.19

3. The next step is to hatch the area which will satisfy x ≥ 2 on the same fig.
• This hatching is done using magenta lines as shown in fig.6.20 below:

Fig.6.20

3. The final step is to hatch the area which will satisfy y ≥ 3 on the same fig.
• This hatching is done using orange lines as shown in fig.6.21 below:

Fig.6.21

• In fig.6.21 above, there are three types of areas:
(i) The area hatched with green lines. 
(ii) The area hatched with magenta lines.
(ii) The area hatched with orange lines.
◼ The triple hatched region which is common to the above three hatched regions is the solution area of given system of inequalities.
    ♦ Mark any point in the solution area.
    ♦ Note down the x and y coordinates of that point.
    ♦ Those x and y coordinate values will satisfy all three inequalities in the given system.
4. Some important points can be noted:
(i) We know that the green hatched area is an infinite area. The magenta and orange hatched areas are also an infinite areas. But the triple hatched area is bounded by the red, cyan and white lines. It is a finite area.
(ii) The point of intersection of the red and cyan lines will give the solution of the system of equations:
5x+4y = 40
x = 2
• The point of intersection of the red and white lines will give the solution of the system of equations:
5x+4y = 40
y = 3
• The point of intersection of the cyan and white lines will give the solution of the system of equations:
x = 2
y = 3
(iii) The area of intersection of the green, magenta and orange hatches, will give the solution area of the system of inequalities:
5x+4y ≤ 40
x ≥ 2
y ≥ 3


• In many practical situations, x and y will represent quantities like cost of items, number of items purchased, number of hours worked by employees, etc.,
• In such cases, x and y cannot be -ve.
    ♦ This fact can be written mathematically as: x ≥ 0 and y ≥ 0
• We know that, if x both x and y are greater than or equal to zero, it has to be the first quadrant.
• So we can write:
If x ≥ 0 and y ≥ 0, then the solution area will lie some where in the first quadrant.


Solved example 6.15
Solve the following system of linear equations graphically.
8x+3y ≤ 100
x ≥ 0
y ≥ 0
Solution:
1. Based on the discussions in the previous two sections, we know how to draw the area which will satisfy 8x+3y ≤ 100
• It is the area hatched with green lines in fig.6.22 below:

Fig.6.22

2. We see that, the green hatched lines are present in all the four quadrants.
• But it is given that, both x and y are greater than or equal to zero. So only the green hatch in the first quadrant is acceptable.
• Thus the required solution area is the area hatched by green lines in fig.6.23 below:

Fig.6.23

Solved example 6.16
Solve the following system of linear equations graphically.
x+2y ≤ 8
2x+y ≤ 8
x ≥ 0
y ≥ 0
Solution:
1. In the fig.6.24 below,
   ♦ the solution area of x+2y ≤ 8 is hatched with green lines.
   ♦ the solution area of 2x+y ≤ 8 is hatched with magenta lines.

Fig.6.24

2. We see that, the double hatch is present in all the four quadrants.
• But it is given that, both x and y are greater than or equal to zero. So only the double hatch in the first quadrant is acceptable.
• Thus the required solution area is the double x hatched area in fig.6.25 below:

Fig.6.25

 

The link below gives some more solved examples:

Exercise 6.3

 


• In the next section, we will see some miscellaneous examples.

Previous

Contents

Next

Copyright©2022 Higher secondary mathematics.blogspot.com